Like, no other time in history has there been so this level of turmoil in the minds of Americans. The amount of conflicting information spreading from house to house is unreal. Depending on which side of the city you are in, or what rural state you stop in, will determine what truths you hear about the results. I am going to assume that everyone is coming from different sides of this story and that no matter what, we all have some parts of this story wrong. There is no way to say without a doubt that once a person has all the facts correct and understands all the nuances of this issue. I also know that we as humans can discern truth and make logical sense of events that take place. If you have kids, you know exactly what I am talking about. When your kid comes to you and explains how the lamp broke when you arrived home and the story just isn’t adding up. The second you hear the story it just sounds fishy, you know your kid, and it doesn’t fall in his normal realm of behavior. You know, to probe a bit deeper. Now anyone else might say his story sounds pretty good, it makes sense. He is innocent, of course. You would never come to that conclusion without investigating to find out facts, and those facts should line up close to the story. If not, you know that something not right has taken place, at least not in the way your child has told you. We call this Inference. The term “inference” refers to using observation and background knowledge to determine a conclusion that makes sense. Or we draw a conclusion from two or more facts. The following is an example of inference.
Jennifer hears her mailbox close, and her dog is barking.
Jennifer can infer that the postal carrier has delivered her mail.
This is where we get circumstantial evidence. Now, this alone cannot say beyond any doubt that the postal carrier came to Jennifer’s house. It is very likely but not absolute and nothing strong enough by this one piece that you would bet your money on this conclusion. This circumstantial evidence becomes almost impenetrable when 3,4,5,6,7,8 unique pieces of the circumstantial evidence line up and all fit within each other to point to the same conclusion. It gets to a point where it would be mathematically impossible for all of this to line up and not be exactly what the evidence is pointing to. We will look at this more towards the end, but for now, let’s look at the fresh evidence.
I bring this up because we keep hearing that there is no evidence in Trump’s case of election fraud. This is largely in part because this is all the mainstream media is shouting from their hill. So everyone listening follows suit, and this idea that zero evidence exists in Trump’s claims of election fraud spreads and grows stronger each time it is told. Now, this is emphatically not the case and the patriots know this. Piles of evidence exist, we are just not hearing about the evidence from a legal standpoint. Why we are not hearing about it can be a multitude of reasons. The first is because this is an investigation and until there is a case that is on the docket and evidence submitted, they will not talk about It. In the eyes of the court there is no evidence yet, but only in the eyes of the court. For reasons soon we will be under consideration, the judges do not want to be the ones responsible for overturning a presidential election.
Let’s look at some of this non-evidence or circumstantial evidence. What I like to call the badges of voter fraud:
-Shortly after midnight (Eastern Time), Trump was leading in all six of the swing states still at issue: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, and had racked up, apart from those six states, 232 electoral votes to Biden’s 227.
-During the early morning hours of Nov. 4, not one or two, but all six states flipped for Biden.
The early morning Nov. 4 “blue-shift” took place only in the six swing states, through a series of “spikes,” almost entirely comprising mailed ballots (made possible because of radical changes in voting laws amid the CCP virus pandemic) in which Biden received the vast majority of the votes. According to an analysis published through Substack, these spikes include:
- “An update in Michigan listed as 6:31 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42 a.m. Central time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows “143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump”
- “A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump”
Those four spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes but only 64,964 Trump votes.
Somehow Biden did very poorly in all parts of the country except only and exactly where it mattered. Out of the 3,000 counties in the United States, 19 so-called “bellwether” counties have had a perfect record, since 1980, of voting for the winner. Trump won 18 of these 19 counties. For example, Vigo County, Indiana, and Valencia County, New Mexico, each has a perfect record of picking the winning candidate since the 1948 election famously gotten wrong by the Chicago Tribune, which ran a cover declaring “Dewey Defeats Truman.” Barack Obama won these two bellwether counties in 2008, yet Trump handily defeated Biden in both and 16 other bellwethers.
n 2008, Obama garnered 69,498,516 votes, the most ever until Biden topped his record with over 80 million votes in 2020, yet, Trump this year won the highest share of nonwhite voters of any Republican since 1960: Roughly one-quarter of nonwhite voters cast their ballots for Trump, according to an Edison exit poll.
Trump improved his 2016 performance (just shy of 63 million votes) by 20 percent in 2020 (over 74 million votes). No incumbent president in U.S. history has ever improved his original performance that much and lost. For example, Obama garnered 3.5 million fewer votes in 2012, yet won a second term.
In sum: Six swing states won by Trump on Election Day, and all six shifted to Biden because of early morning Nov. 4 spikes in mailed-in ballots that overwhelmingly favored Biden; but somehow Biden didn’t win elsewhere in the country; Trump won nearly all (18 of 19) of the historically accurate bellwether counties; Biden, campaigning from his basement, after obvious signs of cognitive decline and the hugely damaging Hunter Biden scandal breaking, running with a vice-presidential candidate who had to drop out of the Democratic nomination race while polling at 5 percent, somehow topped Obama, the first black U.S. president, by over 10 million votes, even as Trump won more of the nonwhite vote than any Republican candidate in the past 60 years.
Aside from these interesting badges of fraud, we have uncovered mountains of direct evidence of widespread voter fraud:
- Radical change to universal mail-in ballots—a weaponisation of the CCP virus pandemic.
- Dramatic ease of mail-in restrictions.
- A dramatic drop in mailed ballot rejection rates.
- Sworn affidavit of “perfect black bubbles” filled in on mailed ballots.
- Sworn affidavits of ballots were counted multiple times.
- Refusal of election authorities to perform simple signature checks on mailed ballots.
- Sworn affidavits of mailed ballots having been backdated.
- Sworn affidavits of “pristine ballots.”
- Testimony of a Pennsylvania trucker concerning massive numbers of ballots shipped to Pennsylvania from Bethpage, New York.
- Ballots from out-of-state voters.
- Ballots from voters listing fraudulent addresses.
- Poll watchers denied access in violation of the law.
- Video evidence of cases of hidden ballot
Let’s look at the 4 types of evidence that is admissible to a legal proceeding.
(Below is not exhaustive)
Physical Evidence: Or real evidence-Georgia where we are finding ballots that have not counted, they cannot match Pennsylvania signatures with those on file, other similar problems in AZ, MI, Wisconsin, we have mountains of factual evidence.
Testimonial Evidence -Hundreds of affidavits of people that say they saw wrongdoing. The amount of testimonial evidence is heavy. People that say they saw multiple ballots being inputted. In the video, we see people with unchecked ballots and turning them in. We see military ballots actively filled out for Joe Biden. Testimonial evidence for all aspects of the dominion voting machine.
Documentary Evidence-Video evidence with suitcases filled with ballots, Video evidence of people ripping up ballots, Video evidence of people filling in ballots, people tearing ballots they don’t like.
Demonstrative Evidence– Consideration of the development of diagrams that lay out the problems of vote chain of custody issues. Physical layouts of vote counting centers, and where vote observers could not be standing, and the reenactment of the evidence to limit the moderating of vote counts.
For evidence to be admissible in a legal procedure, it must meet the following three criteria, it must be relevant, it must be material, and it must be Component. Whether or not the evidence is admissible, its not related to the definition of evidence. In the mind of a judge if evidence does not meet all three criteria, it can still be evidence. When mainstream media says there is no evidence, it does not actually mean there is no evidence.
When viewed in all of its totality it is easy to say that if someone is looking at this rationally, objectively, and empirically, it is easy to say that all four categories of evidence are more than enough to satisfy the demands of the court. This should at a minimum warrant a full investigation as to the claims. There is no way that our courts have kept and fulfilled the call of the constitution to investigate the election under the thesis that this election has been tampered with.
So the real question is, since they have fulfilled all four categories of evidence, why don’t have the courts reversed the election. The legal system doesn’t work like it does when your child breaks a lamp. The judges are not impartial; the judges don’t take overthrowing an election lightly. The judges do not want the legacy of the judge who overturned a presidential election.. Why has the media claimed that there is zero evidence in this case? Is it because there is no evidence? Is it because there is no evidence yet admitted into a court? Why have judges turned hearing the case down? Has Trump his team made all this up and taking the American People on a mindless witch hunt? I will leave those conclusions up to you.
The biggest problem for Trump is time. In a normal case, you have over a year to get your evidence together. For this, we have until 1/20/20. January 20th, another term for a president will be instated no questions asked. It is constitutional. The problem going through the courts; they run rampant with prejudice. Prejudice has become the standard. The courts should be above the party and they are not.
The American people don’t have to be. We have a say. The founding fathers always viewed the state legislature as being the voice of the people. Citizen, or co-ruler as they meant it under the roman society we use the label from. We are the rulers of our country. I agree it is an enormous responsibility. Who will take this responsibility if you don’t? Right now, China. The founding fathers viewed the state legislator as the voice of the people. We need to appeal to our legislature to make our voices heard. If we do nothing, it cannot upset us with the outcome. There are multiple states that did not follow the state legislature. Pennsylvania, the mail-in ballots have to be in by the time of the election. It states this in the constitution. They did not uphold that date and allowed ballots late. They can not do this, the legislature can only do this. This comes down to the state legislature. Texas tried to do something by suing GA. The Texas lawsuit in GA states three voter advocacy groups said the state had improperly removed 198,000 people from its voter registration lists in 2019 because they had changed their addresses. The Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union released a report in September based on an investigation by a progressive independent journalist, Greg Palast, who found that most of the approximately 300,000 people removed had not changed their addresses. Since they completed the investigation, several thousand voters have died or moved, but over 195,000 remained wrongly affected, the suit says. You have people’s age on record and you know the age to vote and people ineligible to vote took votes. The laws of the state legislature are being intentionally defied. Though the Texas lawsuit dismissed because Texas was not the one who had the right to sue it was GA, Georgia needs to sue themselves.
We have been given the right, the choice the freedom to run our country. For so long we have sat on the sidelines and allowed these sick politicians to corrupt our country and use it for evil. We must stand up and fight back. This cannot be permitted any longer. We cannot expect anyone else to do this for us. This will be a long fight and it will not be pretty, it will be worth it and in so doing honoring God.